Exercise 1.3.34

Theorem: Equivalence of categories is an equivalence relation

Proof: Let , and be categories.

Clearly, the identity functor is an equivalence of categories, so equivalence is reflexive.

Suppose is an equivalence. Then we have and natural isomorphisms and .

\eta^1 : 1{\mathbf{A}} \rightarrow GF \qquad \varepsilon^1 : FG \rightarrow 1{\mathbf{B}} \qquad \eta^2 : 1{\mathbf{B}} \rightarrow YX \qquad \varepsilon^2 : XY \rightarrow 1{\mathbf{C}}

$$

Consider , and . We need to show that is naturally isomorphic to . We need to define . In fact, we will write it as the vertical composition of and a new natural transformation . To find an expression for , consider the following diagram:

We can then horizontally compose the natural transformations here (the identity natural transformation on the left and right), to yield a natural transformation -- abusing notation a bit. To be clear, we define .

Then, is a natural isomorphism from to . We proceed similarly to find . Consider:

so define the natural transformation . Then, let .

Finally, then, we have a pair of functors and along with and that make the functors into an equivalence of categories, and such an equivalence is transitive.